Bug 581721
Summary: | iface-list result inconsistent with ifconfig | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Lijian Xu <lxu> |
Component: | libvirt | Assignee: | Daniel Veillard <veillard> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 13 | CC: | berrange, clalance, crobinso, itamar, jforbes, veillard, virt-maint |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-06-03 18:01:07 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Lijian Xu
2010-04-13 05:00:39 UTC
I think this is a mis-understanding of the way the iface-XXX commands work. This will only report on interfaces which have a defined configuration written out. virbr0 is a transient interface managed by libvirt & no ifcfg-virbr0 file, so will never be shown in the iface-list output. My guess is that you are using NetworkManager to configure eth0 which would explain why its not showing. If you are using NM, then selecting the box 'Available to all users' for the eth0 interface should write out the ifcfg-eth0 file which would make it appear in libvirt's iface-list I see. So is it OK no eth0 showing when I use a bridged network 'br0' which shows in the iface-list output? I'm not using NM this time. Yes, unless there is a eth0 config in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts, it is not expected to show up in iface-list, as explained in Comment #1. Closing. |