Bug 58188
Summary: | system hard locks on specific video setting | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Dean Oliver <dean_oliver> | ||||||
Component: | XFree86 | Assignee: | Mike A. Harris <mharris> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> | ||||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||||
Version: | 7.2 | CC: | afom_m, clay_cooper, dale_kaisner, danny_trinh, dean_oliver, john_hull, matt_domsch, michael_e_brown | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
Hardware: | i686 | ||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
Last Closed: | 2002-03-07 20:59:08 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Dean Oliver
2002-01-10 19:55:40 UTC
Please attach you X configuration file, and X server logs using the attachment link below. Also.. Please upgrade your kernel and other packages to the latest official erratum releases. This is most likely a kernel issue. Created attachment 43215 [details]
XFree86 config
Created attachment 43216 [details]
XFree Log
Attached log and config for X. Have tested this with the 2.4.9-13smp kernel and issue still exists. Dean, please try with kernel 2.4.9-21smp. -Matt Word from AMI may help, or not. The following video modes are NOT supported under Windows 2000, and could be related to Linux as well. Resolution Refresh Rate (Hz) Color Depth 800x600 180 32 1024x768 120 32 1024x768 140 32 1024x768 150 32 1024x768 160 32 1152x864 47 24 and 32 1152x864 60 24 and 32 1152x864 70 24 and 32 1152x864 75 24 and 32 1152x864 80 24 and 32 1152x864 85 24 and 32 1152x864 100 24 and 32 1152x864 120 24 and 32 1280x1024 43 24 and 32 1280x1024 47 24 and 32 1280x1024 60 24 and 32 1280x1024 70 24 and 32 1280x1024 74 24 and 32 1280x1024 75 24 and 32 1280x1024 85 24 and 32 1280x1024 90 24 and 32 1280x1024 100 24 and 32 1600x1200 52 16, 24, and 32 1600x1200 58 16, 24, and 32 1600x1200 60 16, 24, and 32 1600x1200 66 16, 24, and 32 1600x1200 72 16, 24, and 32 1600x1200 75 16, 24, and 32 1600x1200 76 16, 24, and 32 1600x1200 85 16, 24, and 32 It's OK to share with Red Hat. Note that this issue arises due to the limitation in memory bandwidth of our current ATI Rage XL implementation. Dell is using a 32 bit frame buffer memory interface with the Rage XL chip. The stock driver which we have been using was written for the 64 bit memory interface. From what you describe above, this seems more like a hardware flaw to me than a software flaw, however if that is the case, about all we can do is detect this video card, and disable all of the above video modes, so that the server does not crash. Could you please see if it continues to occur with the 4.1.0-15 XFree86 erratum release? If so, please also test the rawhide version of XFree86 and see if that changes anything? Also, if the above testing turns out to not solve anything, I will contact ATI myself directly to discuss the problem, and seek assistance at finding a solution. Thanks, TTYL Dean, have you tested this with 2.4.9-21 or the new 2.4.9-31 kernel yet? Jaguar's trying to get out of system test and wants to know what's up with this... Mike, any other news from ATI on this? -Matt SOrry for not responding earlier, I've got an updated driver in now that might work. It's been in the last couple releases. 4.2.0-6.41 being current. Can you test it out and update the report? Thanks Problem seems to be fixed with new driver!! Hampton beta 2 Fantastic. Again, sorry for the delay notifying you of new packages... bugzilla is becoming a universe of its own to keep track of. ;o) Thanks for testing and responding so quickly. Are the new packages slated for: 1) Errata release for 7.2 2) Pensacola release 3) Hampton release ?? -Matt Hampton,however it is possible any erratum released prior to that could also contain the fix as well. Update: This bugfix will soon appear in XFree86 4.1.0 erratum packages for Red Hat Linux 7.1 and 7.2, and also are slated for inclusion in Pensacola as well. An errata has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-066.html |