Bug 58378
Summary: | hdparm should be available on rescue disk | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Jonathan Kamens <jik> |
Component: | installer | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.2 | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2002-01-17 02:48:08 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jonathan Kamens
2002-01-15 14:59:00 UTC
You should be using ide=nodma if that is the issue. We will consider adding hdparm nonetheless. Look, I really don't think you're considering this scenario realistically. People set up a configuration that works and then forget about it. When an admin goes back to a broken machine, perhaps a year after he set it up, there's no way in hell that he's going to remember that he put "ide=nodma" in the LILO or grub configuration. So why should he remember to type "ida=nodma" when he boots rescue mode? On the other hand, when he sees "dmesg" start to spew messages about hard drive errors, it's quite possible that he'll say to himself, "Oh, shit, I'm not supposed to use DMA on these drives! I need to run hdparm to turn it off!" But lo and behold, he can't, because hdparm isn't there. By its very nature, a rescue disk needs to be paranoid. What goes does a rescue mode do if it makes it entirely too easy to screw up the system even more than it's already screwed up? Added in CVS |