Bug 585247
Summary: | CFQ regression in 5.5 with sequential workloads | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Vivek Goyal <vgoyal> |
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Jeff Moyer <jmoyer> |
Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | Red Hat Kernel QE team <kernel-qe> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 5.5 | CC: | jmoyer |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-02-07 16:38:39 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Vivek Goyal
2010-04-23 14:24:11 UTC
iostest seems to rely on bashisms that don't exist in my RHEL 5 version of bash. So, I just ran a fio job file for 1 2 4 and 8 sequential readers. I don't see this performance issue on my storage, an IBM 2810XIV. Maybe I got the fio job file syntax wrong: [global] size=4096m directory=/mnt/test/ ioscheduler=deadline # changed this between runs invalidate=1 runtime=30 time_based rw=read [bsr1] nrfiles=1 [bsr2] stonewall nrfiles=2 [bsr4] stonewall nrfiles=4 [bsr8] stonewall nrfiles=8 I tested with kernel 2.6.18-194.el5. I've tried to reproduce this on my HP EVA, and I am unable to. In fact, the 5.5 kernel seems to perform better than the 5.4 kernel. I'm not sure what to do with this bug at this point. Vivek, I'm closing this bug. If you can reproduce it, feel free to re-open it. Thanks! |