Bug 586767

Summary: [abrt] crash in evolution-data-server-2.28.3-2.fc12: Process /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server-2.28 was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: James Heather <drfudgeboy>
Component: evolution-data-serverAssignee: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 12CC: mbarnes, mcrha
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:c446cab0ceb7fff4a2ce81d14405072d5f951dde
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 09:57:55 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description James Heather 2010-04-28 10:44:00 UTC
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server-2.28 --oaf-activate-iid=OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_DataServer_BookFactory:1.2 --oaf-ior-fd=25
comment: I opened a contact for editing. The contact is in a local address book, but the address book is quite large (~5000 contacts).
component: evolution-data-server
executable: /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server-2.28
global_uuid: c446cab0ceb7fff4a2ce81d14405072d5f951dde
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.x86_64
package: evolution-data-server-2.28.3-2.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server-2.28 was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

Comment 1 James Heather 2010-04-28 10:44:03 UTC
Created attachment 409760 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:57:55 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 578915 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:57:55 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #578915.

Sorry for the inconvenience.