Bug 587550
Summary: | libsmbclient/samba3x tech-preview packages are not removed from the supplementary channel after an import on disconnected Satellite | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Satellite 5 | Reporter: | Vishal Gaikwad <vgaikwad> | |
Component: | Satellite Synchronization | Assignee: | Miroslav Suchý <msuchy> | |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Petr Sklenar <psklenar> | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | medium | |||
Version: | 530 | CC: | cperry, cww, jpazdziora, mzazrivec, psklenar, tao | |
Target Milestone: | --- | |||
Target Release: | --- | |||
Hardware: | All | |||
OS: | Linux | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 608657 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-10-05 13:17:24 UTC | Type: | --- | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | 608657 | |||
Bug Blocks: | 518253 |
Description
Vishal Gaikwad
2010-04-30 08:58:52 UTC
Event posted on 06-10-2010 08:58am EDT by kbaxley Some other packages from the main RHEL5 channel that weren't cleaned up from the 5.4 to 5.5 sync... On the production disconnected classified satellite we have the x86_64 packages: kmod-be2net-rhel5u4-2.101.377r-1.4.el5_4 kmod-be2net-xen-rhel5u4-2.101.377r-1.4.el5_4 But these aren't on the connected satellite that we sync from. This event sent from IssueTracker by kbaxley issue 847343 Fixed in spacewalk see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608657#c1 An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0740.html |