Bug 588401
Summary: | The create compatible group "Select Resource Type..." option for "JBossAS Server" changes | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Other] RHQ Project | Reporter: | John Sefler <jsefler> |
Component: | Resource Grouping | Assignee: | RHQ Project Maintainer <rhq-maint> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Corey Welton <cwelton> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 1.4 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-09-21 01:55:36 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 591531 |
Description
John Sefler
2010-05-03 16:49:15 UTC
I think this design needs to be fixed. There is no need to hide the plugin name when there's only one of many same-named resource types. It's misleading. It makes the user think that a compatible group can contain both jbossas4 and jbossas5, when it cannot. Consider this scenario - user adds jbossas4 servers to inventory, creates a compatible group, and chooses "JBossAS Server" and adds his jbossas4 servers. He thinks, "ok I have a group of JBossAS Servers. Now I am going to import some JBossAS5 servers and add them to the group". And when he goes to add them he can't add them. closing this bug per the gwt redesign. it can be reopened if considered critical or re-visited when the gwt implementation is available. |