Bug 588901

Summary: listLatestUpgradablePackages returns too many packages
Product: [Community] Spacewalk Reporter: Joshua Roys <roysjosh>
Component: APIAssignee: Joshua Roys <roysjosh>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 1.1   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-19 16:16:34 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 623772    
Attachments:
Description Flags
patch to fix none

Description Joshua Roys 2010-05-04 19:24:39 UTC 
Description of problem:
package arch is not taken into account in the SQL query underlying this API call

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
git HEAD

How reproducible:
python swapi.py -A $SYSTEMID -s $SERVER -u $USER system.listLatestUpgradablePackages

Steps to Reproduce:
1. push glibc.i386, .i686, .x86_64 to a channel.
2. have .i686 and .x86_64 installed on a host subscribed to above channel
3. execute API call
  
Actual results:
all 3 glibc packages are returned as candidates for updating

Expected results:
only .i686 and .x86_64 get returned as updates

Additional info:
Comment 1 Joshua Roys 2010-05-04 19:27:13 UTC 
Created attachment 411383 [details]
patch to fix
Comment 2 Joshua Roys 2010-05-04 19:41:22 UTC 
Fixed in spacewalk.git master 3f6829d6aa6f06cee89e235f2519fb128a7ab8e7
Comment 3 Joshua Roys 2010-05-05 15:52:51 UTC 
Follow-up fix in 7bd8078b7dc3483f97245f8049ef8f7f688bce83
This will return the correct to_package_id
Comment 4 Jan Pazdziora 2010-10-27 08:32:23 UTC 
Mass-aligning under space12, so that we don't lose track of this bugzilla. This however does not mean that we plan (will be able to) address this bug in Spacewalk 1.2.
Comment 5 Jan Pazdziora 2010-11-15 19:30:42 UTC 
Moving ON_QA.

Please use the Spacewalk 1.2 release candidate yum repo at

http://koji.spacewalkproject.org/spacewalk/split/spacewalk-5E/server/spacewalk-5E-1.2/$basearch/os
http://koji.spacewalkproject.org/spacewalk/split/spacewalk-f12/server/spacewalk-f12-1.2/$basearch/os
http://koji.spacewalkproject.org/spacewalk/split/spacewalk-f13/server/spacewalk-f13-1.2/$basearch/os
http://koji.spacewalkproject.org/spacewalk/split/spacewalk-f14/server/spacewalk-f14-1.2/$basearch/os

(depending on your OS) to verify the bugzilla.
Comment 6 Jan Pazdziora 2010-11-19 16:16:34 UTC 
With Spacewalk 1.2 released, marking as CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE.

https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2010-November/msg00111.html