Bug 589251

Summary: [abrt] crash in evolution-exchange-2.28.3-1.fc12: Process /usr/libexec/evolution/2.28/evolution-exchange-storage was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Louis van Dyk <louis>
Component: evolution-exchangeAssignee: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 12CC: mbarnes, mcrha
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:a8d3d3278a5993e125af3dd21b1d5d14846a8589
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 10:08:38 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Louis van Dyk 2010-05-05 16:25:56 UTC
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/evolution/2.28/evolution-exchange-storage --oaf-activate-iid=OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_Exchange_Component_Factory:2.28 --oaf-ior-fd=35
component: evolution-exchange
executable: /usr/libexec/evolution/2.28/evolution-exchange-storage
global_uuid: a8d3d3278a5993e125af3dd21b1d5d14846a8589
kernel: 2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64
package: evolution-exchange-2.28.3-1.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/evolution/2.28/evolution-exchange-storage was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

How to reproduce
-----
1. I sent a mail using Exchange.
2. The mail was being delivered.
3. Evolution-Exchange crashed.

Comment 1 Louis van Dyk 2010-05-05 16:26:16 UTC
Created attachment 411666 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 10:08:38 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 566262 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 10:08:38 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #566262.

Sorry for the inconvenience.