Bug 589895
Summary: | fcgi-perl with perl-5.12.0 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano> |
Component: | fcgi | Assignee: | Chris Weyl <cweyl> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | cweyl, opensource |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-07-15 09:08:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 590324 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Marcela Mašláňová
2010-05-07 08:46:29 UTC
We've also seen development in the last several months to the FCGI package hosted on the CPAN. While 0.67 (last updated in 2002) is AFAICT the same as the FCGI package provided by fcgi, I'm not sure the recent work is in sync with FCGI here anymore. 0.70 && 0.71 were both releases specifically targeting the perl 5.12 introduced depreciation reported here. If there's a correspondingly new fcgi package, we should probably update the whole kit. ...but if there is, I can't find it; and it doesn't look like the CPAN-generated diff[1] from 0.67 to 0.71 applies cleanly to the fcgi source perl/ directory. It might be time to package perl-FCGI from 0.71 on the CPAN, and have it provide/obsolete fcgi-perl. Comments? :) [1] http://search.cpan.org/diff/FCGI-0.67-FCGI-0.71.-w.diff So, perl-FCGI 0.71 is in rawhide (well, dist-f14-perltest), and F-13/12 testing. I'll let it sit in testing for a couple weeks, then go in and remove the underlying -perl subpackage bits from fcgi so we're not always building an obsolete-when-built fcgi-perl. If fcgi development becomes active again and consumes FCGI, I don't have a problem reversing this (that is, restoring the subpackage and having it obsolete the standalone package). Sound good? :) |