Bug 590487

Summary:	Non-responsive Package Maintainer process.
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Steve Traylen <steve.traylen>
Component:	torque	Assignee:	Steve Traylen <steve.traylen>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	supercyper1
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-06-07 17:13:12 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Steve Traylen 2010-05-09 19:37:00 UTC

I am following this process:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers

Please could you respond.

I would like to take over the torque maintenance in Fedora as
I do now in EPEL.

Similarly also the packages

perl-Curses and perl-PBS

which I would be happy to take also


I've sent a few mails in the past privately  to take ownership particularly
around the time I requested the EPEL branch
.
The most recent was a week ago with out response.

The last CVS commit was  April 2008

The last non rel-eng build in devel was also at this time.

Currently F13 is shipping with version 2.1.10 which was released
upstream 12 Dec 2007.

Upstream (which I realize is in a very much large part you)  currently ships:

2.1.11  released 13 Nov 2008

2.3.10  released 2nd Feb 2010 (this is what EPEL4/5 has)

2.4.8   released 29 Apr 2010

Reviewing the open bug list.

Bug #527541  submitted 2009-10  , includes proposed fix - no activity.
Bug #528945  submitted 2009-10  , no activity , possibly just a support request.
Bug #528060  submitted 2009-10  , valid bug, no activity.
Bug #556098  submitted 2010-01  , static libs in torque, no activity.

Comment 1 Steve Traylen 2010-05-16 21:59:24 UTC

Hi,

Following this process:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers

this request for response has now been present for one week, hence the
new request for information.

One more request in 7 days time will be may via this bug.

Steve.

Comment 2 Chen Lei 2010-05-24 01:38:09 UTC

I think perl-PBS should be renamed to PBS-perl or retired from fedora, it conflict with PBS in CPAN.

Comment 3 Steve Traylen 2010-05-24 06:00:44 UTC

This is the last request in this bug for an update from the current maintainer.

Following this process 

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers

the next step will be a mail to the fedora-devel list in a weeks time.

Steve.

Comment 4 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2010-06-07 17:04:29 UTC

This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 5 Steve Traylen 2010-06-07 17:13:12 UTC

I'll close this bug now.

Chen Lei,

 Re comment #2 then please open a new bug against perl-PBS.