Bug 590743
Summary: | Add .xz support for, at least, .sqlite MD ... mostly solves the N versions of kernel with 9k provides problem | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | James Antill <james.antill> |
Component: | yum | Assignee: | James Antill <james.antill> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 6.0 | CC: | jcm, jhutar |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-06-26 19:33:37 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
James Antill
2010-05-10 15:27:19 UTC
Also, in case it wasn't obvious, yes if we _have_ to we can probably delay this until 6.1 _however_ that means anyone installing GA for all of RHEL-6 is going to download a bigger .sqlite.bz2 (and/or anyone who refuses to update yum). Where if we do the yum change for 6.0, then even if we don't do the server change until later all users will get the benefit. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux major release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Major release. This request is not yet committed for inclusion. Quality Engineering Management has reviewed and declined this request. You may appeal this decision by reopening this request. Moving to 6.1 ... note that we have the bindings now, so we just need the minor createrepo and yum changes to use it. Removing the bindings blocker moving to 6.2.x ... it's not done upstream, yet. And pyliblzma is only just available in Fed-14. Still not done upstream ... need to think about again, WRT repodata. Given we opened it, and it's not on in Fedora, and there have been a couple of weird issues when people have tried it outside Fedora ... and that we'd still need to change the server side. I think we can just drop this for RHEL-6. This request was not resolved in time for the current release. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Not much has changed since comment #12, closing this out. |