Bug 59086
Summary: | .spec file in binutils-2.11.92.0.12-9.src.rpm has wrong %ifarch and also linker scripts aren't installed. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide | Reporter: | Sergey Ostrovsky <sostrovsky> |
Component: | binutils | Assignee: | Jakub Jelinek <jakub> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 1.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2002-02-01 21:42:02 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Sergey Ostrovsky
2002-01-30 19:17:36 UTC
What do you need ldscripts for? ld has them built in and can be dumped any time using --verbose. Uhm, well, I had no clue what I was talking about. I just noticed that binutils installed from the tar ball have ldscripts dir, Suse not only has them but additionally puts %^&$load of symlinks over it. Thanks for the info. 2. I noticed something else in binutils.spec # Binutils come with its own custom libtool %define __libtoolize echo a. Macro expansion happens on .spec file only. b. It is not useful until the construct %__libtoolize is used. Am I missing something ? Sorry. It's used in %configure. Best regards. %{ix86} is in 2.11.93.0.2-2, I don't think we need to ship ldscripts. |