Bug 590935
Summary: | Dual Monitors deviate from standard expectations | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Robert Lightfoot <BobLfoot> |
Component: | gnome-desktop | Assignee: | Ray Strode [halfline] <rstrode> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 13 | CC: | awilliam, dcantrell, rstrode |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-05-16 12:33:43 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Robert Lightfoot
2010-05-11 02:08:17 UTC
I'm having a hard time figuring out how this could be a release blocker. I'll defer to those more experienced than I but wanted to raise a flag that Dual Monitor performance in F13 was significantly different than F12. If be design then not an issue. If by "accident" but acceptable to the majority then also not a blocker. If going to cause discomfort and mis-understanding among the masses then definitely worth discussing. the masses don't have dual monitors, for one thing, and are probably liable to realize that if they _do_, stuff might be on the other. there's no reason to consider this a blocker. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers Livable for me based on Adam's feedback - I concur should not be classified a blocker. |