Bug 59126

Summary:	Can squid be updated to 2.5 please?
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide	Reporter:	Reuben Farrelly <reuben-redhatbugzilla>
Component:	squid	Assignee:	Jay Fenlason <fenlason>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	1.0	CC:	irc, jfeeney
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-01-15 22:36:29 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Reuben Farrelly 2002-01-31 12:37:32 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; Q312461)

Description of problem:
New squid packages available

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Obtain latest Squid-2.4-STABLE2 SRPM
2. Download squid-2.5-PRE3 tarball
3. Attempt to make a new RPM => fails due to patching errors
4. Additionally, some of the paths of the binaries built have changed
	

Actual Results:  Patches fail to apply as the new squid uses automake and has 
changes to some of the code where patches apply.

Expected Results:  Expecting a build ;-)

Additional info:

Am hoping that a new version of Squid becomes available on rawhide soon.  The 
new squid is nearly ready to be released as stable and contains some useful new 
authentication mechanisms and reverse proxy with SSL, which would extend the 
usefullness of this package.

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2002-02-04 20:47:03 UTC

We'll do it when they release a stable version; we won't upgrade to development
versions.

Comment 2 Reuben Farrelly 2002-11-28 11:58:13 UTC

Squid 2.5 STABLE1 has now been out for over 2 months.  Can we have an update 
please?

The new squid sports many handy new features and unfortunately the 2.5 bz-
tarball is not a drop in replacement in a 2.4 specfile due to path and file 
changes...

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2002-12-24 21:10:24 UTC

*** Bug 80306 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Michael Young 2003-01-14 12:01:42 UTC

Actually 2.5.STABLE1 isn't all that stable, at least for heavy use. The latest
snapshot is much better, but still not perfect.

Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2003-01-15 22:36:29 UTC

2.5.STABLE1-1 in rawhide.