Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Review Request: beah - Test Harness|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Marian Csontos <mcsontos>|
|Component:||Package Review||Assignee:||Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>|
|Status:||CLOSED NOTABUG||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||bpeck, fedora-package-review, notting|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2012-04-26 14:34:11 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Marian Csontos 2010-05-11 18:18:42 EDT
Spec URL: http://mcsontos.fedorapeople.org/beah/0.6.rpmlint.4/beah.spec SRPM URL: http://mcsontos.fedorapeople.org/beah/0.6.rpmlint.4/beah-0.6.rpmlint.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Beah - Beaker Test Harness. Ultimate Test Harness, with goal to serve any tests and any test scheduler tools. Harness consist of a server and two kinds of clients - backends and tasks. Backends issue commands to Server and process events from tasks. Tasks are mostly events producers. Powered by Twisted. FE-NEEDSPONSOR ============== This is my first package and I need a sponsor. Thanks.
Comment 2 Marian Csontos 2010-05-11 18:42:22 EDT
Created attachment 413282 [details] mock output (F11)
Comment 3 Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-19 11:38:18 EST
Some random comments. This builds but doesn't install properly: Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package beah-0.6.rpmlint.4-1.fc15.noarch chkconfig version 1.3.49 - Copyright (C) 1997-2000 Red Hat, Inc. This may be freely redistributed under the terms of the GNU Public License. usage: chkconfig [--list] [--type <type>] [name] chkconfig --add <name> chkconfig --del <name> chkconfig --override <name> chkconfig [--level <levels>] [--type <type>] <name> <on|off|reset|resetpriorities> warning: %post(beah-0.6.rpmlint.4-1.fc15.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 Please remove the rhel3 stuff; there's no point at all in it as el4 is the oldest thing you can build for. Summary: and %description could use some work. In particular, there's no need to have the URL of the project in the Summary; that's what the URL: field is for. Explicit python(abi) dependency is unnecessary (and redundant) in Fedora; you end up with: python(abi) >= 2.3 python(abi) = 2.7 there's also no need for the manual python dependency. Source0: URL is invalid.
Comment 4 Marian Csontos 2010-11-22 04:03:04 EST
Thanks for the comments. I will try to iron out these issues. Re: el3: We are still using RHEL3 :-( However I would like to have a cleaner master and having a separate branch for things like el3 support - no need for the clutter in master spec.
Comment 5 Michael Schwendt 2012-04-26 14:34:11 EDT
With regard today's thread on fedora devel list, I'm closing this in accordance with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews as nothing has happened in here since 2010-11-22, and tickets like this fill existing tracker pages, such as http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEEDSPONSOR.html which makes it less easy to process them regularly.