Bug 59135

Summary: package not found
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Reporter: Isaiah Weiner <iweiner>
Component: up2dateAssignee: Mihai Ibanescu <mihai.ibanescu>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Jay Turner <jturner>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.0CC: cturner, gafton, mihai.ibanescu, pjones, srevivo, taw
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-05-01 16:35:36 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Isaiah Weiner 2002-01-31 16:21:10 UTC
Description of problem:
I selected the gdb errata from the 7.1 channel, tried to deliver it to the 
profile for b2-lnx.  According to the system details, it checks in successfully 
regularly, but the package isn't getting delivered.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. up2date gdb

Actual Results:  [root@b2-lnx /root]# up2date gdb

Retrieving list of all available packages...

Removing installed packages from list of updates...
########################################

Removing packages with files not specified from list...

Removing packages marked to skip from list...
########################################

Getting headers for available packages...
There was a fatal error communicating with the server.  The message was:

Error Message:
    Package ['gdb', '5.1', '0.71', '', 1139089] not found
Error Class Code: 17
Error Class Info: File not found.
Explanation: 
     An error has occurred while processing your request. If this problem
     persists please submit a bug report to rhn-help.
     If you choose to submit the bug report, please be sure to include
     details of what you were trying to do when this error occurred and
     details on how to reproduce this problem.

[root@b2-lnx /root]# 


Expected Results:  From what you guys mentioned on the phone, it sounds like 
since the pulling of the package is done with up2date anyway, and since this 
error is duplicated many times in /var/log/up2date on the client, that's the 
only inhibiting factor for the package delivery.

Additional info:

The client points at the proxy.

Comment 1 Mihai Ibanescu 2002-01-31 18:20:47 UTC
Could you try a
grep ERROR /var/log/rhn/rhn.log
(or rhns.log)
and tell me what the output is?
(proxy code)

Comment 2 Isaiah Weiner 2002-01-31 18:53:34 UTC
Zarro results.

Comment 3 Mihai Ibanescu 2002-01-31 19:09:17 UTC
grep gdb 
for the same file?
also:
grep gdb /var/log/httpd/access_log

Comment 4 Isaiah Weiner 2002-01-31 19:10:52 UTC
[10:56:48|iweiner:linus:~]$ grep gdb /var/log/httpd/access_log 
127.0.0.1 - - [04/Dec/2001:20:31:44 -0800] "GET /XMLRPC_SSL/$RHN/redhat-linux-
i386-7.1/getPackageHeader/gdb-5.1-0.71.i386.hdr HTTP/1.0" 200 11373 "-
" "rhnHTTPlib.py/1.25"
127.0.0.1 - - [04/Dec/2001:20:40:36 -0800] "GET /XMLRPC_SSL/$RHN/redhat-linux-
i386-7.1/getPackage/gdb-5.1-0.71.i386.rpm HTTP/1.0" 200 1139089 "-
" "rhnHTTPlib.py/1.25"
[11:10:07|iweiner:linus:~]$ grep gdb /var/log/rhn/rhns.log     
[11:10:15|iweiner:linus:~]$

Comment 5 Isaiah Weiner 2002-03-12 19:36:56 UTC
Might this be related to #60805?

Comment 6 Greg DeKoenigsberg 2002-04-29 23:45:53 UTC
Is this package simply absent?

Comment 7 Isaiah Weiner 2002-04-29 23:53:28 UTC
No, the package was there.  It was part of the RHL channel, too.  Not an issue 
now, since everything works, but at the time, it was something chip manually 
fixed.

Comment 8 Mihai Ibanescu 2002-05-01 16:35:32 UTC
Ok, should we close this bug?