Bug 591462

Summary: [abrt] crash in gnome-panel-2.30.0-1.fc13: do_idle_run_queue: Process /usr/libexec/clock-applet was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Diogo Lima <diogo.urb>
Component: gnome-panelAssignee: Ray Strode [halfline] <rstrode>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 13CC: rstrode
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:e17e7d8a20722d781b32acb69ba22111bcd1bb2e
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 08:49:52 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Diogo Lima 2010-05-12 10:11:41 UTC
abrt 1.1.0 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/clock-applet --oaf-activate-iid=OAFIID:GNOME_ClockApplet_Factory --oaf-ior-fd=34
component: gnome-panel
crash_function: do_idle_run_queue
executable: /usr/libexec/clock-applet
global_uuid: e17e7d8a20722d781b32acb69ba22111bcd1bb2e
kernel: 2.6.33.3-85.fc13.x86_64
package: gnome-panel-2.30.0-1.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/clock-applet was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

comment
-----
It crashed when I tried to add Rio de Janeiro, zone on the clock watch.

After restarting the applet it no longer happens.

How to reproduce
-----
1. Go to the clock options
2. Add a New zone (Rio de Janeiro/Sao_Paulo)
3.

Comment 1 Diogo Lima 2010-05-12 10:11:43 UTC
Created attachment 413384 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 08:49:52 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 572829 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 08:49:52 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #572829.

Sorry for the inconvenience.