Bug 592180
Summary: | Spelling error in `virsh nodedev-dettach` | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | zhanghaiyan <yoyzhang> |
Component: | libvirt | Assignee: | Daniel Veillard <veillard> |
Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 6.0 | CC: | berrange, clalance, llim, notting, tyan, xen-maint |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-05-14 09:54:43 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
zhanghaiyan
2010-05-14 07:21:33 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux major release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Major release. This request is not yet committed for inclusion. THis has been known about for a long time, but it cannot be fixed because renaming the command will break any scripts currently using this functionality. However, we could add a shadow command that used exactly the same implementation, but was named correctly. Then we would have both "virsh nodedev-dettach" and "virsh nodedev-detach", but newer users could use the correct spelling. Chris Lalancette That will cause more trouble than it is worth, because then people will write scripts / docs using 'nodedev-detach' and they'll not be compatible with any existing deployment. Well, we could certainly backport the right spelling to any production we ship, couldn't we? (I realize you can't *force* people to deploy errata, but...) |