Bug 592366

Summary: [abrt] crash in evolution-exchange-2.28.3-1.fc12: g_hash_table_lookup_node: Process /usr/libexec/evolution/2.28/evolution-exchange-storage was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: generalmills3808
Component: evolution-exchangeAssignee: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 12CC: mbarnes, mcrha
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:9d62e7d144c482cd81ec1abb9c723e73d2df7264
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 09:02:32 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description generalmills3808 2010-05-14 16:26:18 UTC 
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/evolution/2.28/evolution-exchange-storage --oaf-activate-iid=OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_Exchange_Component_Factory:2.28 --oaf-ior-fd=33
component: evolution-exchange
crash_function: g_hash_table_lookup_node
executable: /usr/libexec/evolution/2.28/evolution-exchange-storage
global_uuid: 9d62e7d144c482cd81ec1abb9c723e73d2df7264
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.i686
package: evolution-exchange-2.28.3-1.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/evolution/2.28/evolution-exchange-storage was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

comment
-----
It's semi random when evolution will have a packet crash.  I have been using evolution in an exchange environmnet for over a year now, and only untill a month ago have these crashes surfaced.  


How to reproduce
-----
1.  Open evolution 
2.  Start reading e-mail as normally
3.  Eventually evolution will have a packet crash
Comment 1 generalmills3808 2010-05-14 16:26:19 UTC 
Created attachment 414105 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:02:32 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 577361 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:02:32 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #577361.

Sorry for the inconvenience.