Bug 59292
Summary: | Mozilla downloads wrong JRE plug-in | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Robert M. Riches Jr. <rm.riches> |
Component: | mozilla | Assignee: | Christopher Blizzard <blizzard> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Ben Levenson <benl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.1 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | alpha | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2002-05-16 18:36:29 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Robert M. Riches Jr.
2002-02-04 19:10:47 UTC
So what would be the right behaviour here? I don't think that we have a working JVM for mozilla for the alpha, right? Should I just disable the dialog? That would be better than the present behavior. If Mozilla requires a whole separate JVM, separate from a JDK the user might have already have on the machine, and if there is no downloadable JVM for the architecture in question, then it would be better to inform the user that no JVM exists for that machine. Thanks. JVM exists for Alpha, the problem is with the plug-in. So, it would be better to inform the user that no plug-in exists for that machine. Where is the JVM? I fixed this in the 0.9.9 build by not allowing the plugin downloader to go to the downloader site. Downloading and installing a .xpi as a user doesn't work correctly in any case. Anyway, fixed in the last 7.2 errata. |