Bug 593030

Summary:	missing dependencies on libgomp.i386 and libstdc++44-devel.i386
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	Jeff Bastian <jbastian>
Component:	gcc44	Assignee:	Jakub Jelinek <jakub>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	qe-baseos-tools-bugs
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	5.5	CC:	tao
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-05-17 19:58:28 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jeff Bastian 2010-05-17 16:33:07 UTC

Description of problem:
The gcc44 and gcc44-c++ x86_64 packages have broken symbolic links if libgomp.i386 and libstdc++44-devel.i386 are not installed:

$ sudo yum install gcc44.x86_64 gcc44-c++.x86_64
...
$ rpm -ql gcc44 gcc44-c++ | xargs file | grep 'broken symbolic'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux6E/4.4.0/32/libgomp.so:             broken symbolic link to `../../../../libgomp.so.1.0.0'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux6E/4.4.0/32/libstdc++.a:            broken symbolic link to `../../../i386-redhat-linux6E/4.4.0/libstdc++.a'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux6E/4.4.0/32/libstdc++_nonshared.a:  broken symbolic link to `../../../i386-redhat-linux6E/4.4.0/libstdc++_nonshared.a'


Adding the other two packages fixes the symbolic links:

$ sudo yum install libgomp.i386 libstdc++44-devel.i386
...
$ rpm -ql gcc44 gcc44-c++ | xargs file | grep 'broken symbolic'
$


Can you add these two packages as dependencies?


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gcc44-4.4.0-6.el5.x86_64
gcc44-c++-4.4.0-6.el5.x86_64

How reproducible:
every time

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install gcc44.x86_64 gcc44-c++.x86_64
2. rpm -ql gcc44 gcc44-c++ | xargs file | grep 'broken symbolic'
  
Actual results:
3 broken symbolic links

Expected results:
no broken symbolic links

Additional info:

Comment 3 Jakub Jelinek 2010-05-17 19:58:28 UTC

The missing dependencies are very much intentional.
gcc supports both 32-bit and 64-bit compilation, and certainly doesn't need 32-bit libraries to compile 64-bit stuff, which is the default.
Adding the dependencies would make it impossible to have *.i?86.rpm less installs.

If you compile with -m32, it is user's responsibility to install 32-bit development packages.