Bug 593784
Summary: | RHEL6 installer mounts-by-UUID not label / labels are on filesystems, not partitions | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Steve Bonneville <sbonnevi> |
Component: | doc-Storage_Admin_Guide | Assignee: | Don Domingo <ddomingo> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | ecs-bugs |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 6.0 | CC: | jskeoch |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Documentation |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-11-11 15:36:26 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 561597 |
Description
Steve Bonneville
2010-05-19 17:04:40 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux major release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Major release. This request is not yet committed for inclusion. http://documentation-stage.bne.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Storage_Administration_Guide/s3-disk-storage-parted-create-part-mkfs.html Verified in Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux-Storage_Administration_Guide-6-en-US-0-5 http://documentation-stage.bne.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Storage_Administration_Guide/s3-disk-storage-parted-create-part-fstab.html Still contains terminology about "partition" when it should be "file system". The following is just one example. The first column should contain LABEL= followed by the label you gave the partition. Should be The first column should contain LABEL= followed by the label you gave the file system. Suggest all instances in the section should be "file system". Also, was there a reason continuing to use LABEL= instead of UUID= as per Steve's comment? (In reply to comment #5) <snip> > http://documentation-stage.bne.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Storage_Administration_Guide/s3-disk-storage-parted-create-part-fstab.html > > Still contains terminology about "partition" when it should be "file system". > > The following is just one example. > > The first column should contain LABEL= followed by the label you gave the > partition. > > Should be > > The first column should contain LABEL= followed by the label you gave the file > system. > corrected this: http://brisvegas.bne.redhat.com/rhel6-storageguide/s3-disk-storage-parted-create-part-fstab.html along with: http://brisvegas.bne.redhat.com/rhel6-storageguide/s2-disk-storage-parted-create-part.html#s3-disk-storage-parted-create-part-mkpart was: After creating the partition, use the print command to confirm that it is in the partition table with the correct partition type, file system type, and size. Also remember the minor number of the new partition so that you can label it. now: After creating the partition, use the print command to confirm that it is in the partition table with the correct partition type, file system type, and size. Also remember the minor number of the new partition so that you can label any file systems on it. > Suggest all instances in the section should be "file system". > > Also, was there a reason continuing to use LABEL= instead of UUID= as per > Steve's comment? i thought Steve meant i could keep the label approach as long as i applied his edits. anyhow, edited: http://brisvegas.bne.redhat.com/rhel6-storageguide/s3-disk-storage-parted-create-part-fstab.html Verified: Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux-Storage_Administration_Guide-6-web-en-US-0-13.el5 incl. comment#8 "you can label any file systems" Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.0 is now available and should resolve the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of CURRENTRELEASE. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. |