Bug 594975
| Summary: | Preupgrade offers upgrade to Rawhide, but Rawhide install images are no longer provided | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Frank Murphy <frankly3d> | ||||
| Component: | preupgrade | Assignee: | Richard Hughes <richard> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | low | ||||||
| Version: | 13 | CC: | jlaska, rhughes, richard, robatino | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2010-08-01 12:19:23 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Frank Murphy
2010-05-22 12:54:00 UTC
Created attachment 422909 [details] data/releases.txt (patch) The attached patch will adjust the releases.txt file included in preupgrade. However, I think Fedora infrastructure TRAC ticket#2216 (https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2216) will be needed to track updating the official http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/releases.txt file so that it no longer offers 'Rawhide'. Does anything else use releases.txt? (In reply to comment #1) > Does anything else use releases.txt? PackageKit, but it uses the one shipped in preupgrade. Richard. (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Does anything else use releases.txt? > > PackageKit, but it uses the one shipped in preupgrade. Ah okay. So I don't know if releases.txt is intended to track "Installable" releases, or just repositories. I think the former? How would PackageKit be impacted by removing the 'Rawhide' stanza from releases.txt? (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > Does anything else use releases.txt? > > > > PackageKit, but it uses the one shipped in preupgrade. > > Ah okay. So I don't know if releases.txt is intended to track "Installable" > releases, or just repositories. I think the former? Correct. > How would PackageKit be impacted by removing the 'Rawhide' stanza from > releases.txt? Not at all -- the GUI doesn't show unstable releases. Removing it from http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/releases.txt has now adjusted the behaviour of the GUI, so that even if "Display unstable" is check Rawhide will not show up. :) (In reply to comment #5) > Removing it from http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/releases.txt > > has now adjusted the behaviour of the GUI, so that even if "Display unstable" > is check Rawhide will not show up. > > :) Hi Frank, I can't tell from your comment if this was a question or not. But to confirm your findings, the intent of removing 'Rawhide' from http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/releases.txt is so that it will *not* display as an option in preupgrade. Rawhide install images are no longer provided When Fedora 14 is Branched from rawhide, releases.txt will be updated to offer preupgrade -> Fedora 14 (Branched). Has been fixed. |