Bug 595573

Summary: [abrt] crash in java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-38.b18.fc12: raise: Process /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/bin/java was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ricky Prego <njdevilsfan24>
Component: java-1.6.0-openjdkAssignee: Deepak Bhole <dbhole>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 12CC: dbhole, langel, lkundrak, mjw, mmatejov
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:2f609e52ba06d799111053b757a75eda09ac9d5a
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 09:56:25 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Ricky Prego 2010-05-25 02:59:40 UTC 
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/../../bin/java sun.applet.PluginMain /tmp/icedteaplugin-rprego/2640-icedteanp-plugin-to-appletviewer /tmp/icedteaplugin-rprego/2640-icedteanp-appletviewer-to-plugin
component: java-1.6.0-openjdk
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/bin/java
global_uuid: 2f609e52ba06d799111053b757a75eda09ac9d5a
kernel: 2.6.32.12-115.fc12.x86_64
package: java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-38.b18.fc12
rating: 3
reason: Process /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/bin/java was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

How to reproduce
-----
1. Log in to https://elearn.stevens.edu
2. Java crashes
3.
Comment 1 Ricky Prego 2010-05-25 02:59:42 UTC 
Created attachment 416265 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:56:25 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 540962 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:56:25 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #540962.

Sorry for the inconvenience.