Bug 596058
Summary: | SSL peer reports incorrect Message Authentication Code in versions >= 1.2.2 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] 389 | Reporter: | Juan <okelet> |
Component: | Directory Server | Assignee: | Rich Megginson <rmeggins> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Chandrasekar Kannan <ckannan> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 7.1 | CC: | andrey.ivanov, benl, jgalipea, mbarper, mniranja |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-10-04 11:59:09 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 434915 |
Description
Juan
2010-05-26 08:55:26 UTC
Is it possible to reproduce this problem with ldapsearch, or do you have to use getent groups? I have the same problem, and I would like to use getent groups. (In reply to comment #7) > I have the same problem, and I would like to use getent groups. What platform? What version of 389-ds-base? What platform are the clients running on? Can you reproduce the problem from the client using ldapsearch, or is it necessary to use getent? Centos 5.5, 389-ds-base-1.2.5-1.el5, clients runs Centos 5.4. I can't reproduce the problem from client using ldapsearch and I need to use getent because of this problem when I use "id" on my scripts or "sudo -l". I have about 1100 groups, about 44000 members and 16000 unique members. Centos 5.5, 389-ds-base-1.2.5-1.el5, clients runs Centos 5.4. I can't reproduce the problem from client using ldapsearch and I need to use getent because of this problem when I use "id" on my scripts or "sudo -l". I have about 1100 groups, about 44000 members and 16000 unique members. This is a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676384 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 676384 *** |