Bug 597545

Summary: [abrt] crash in gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.5-2.fc13: panel_applet_gconf_get_int: Process /usr/libexec/sensors-applet was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: behzadnouri
Component: gnome-applet-sensorsAssignee: Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala <huzaifas>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 13CC: huzaifas, igor.katalnikov, juniorroy, klmitch, lgraves, liblit, req1348
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:738761f5d49cc37f60e716cb6ff1044435b50571
Fixed In Version: gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.7-3.fc13 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-08-21 04:26:13 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description behzadnouri 2010-05-29 13:46:18 UTC 
abrt 1.1.0 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/sensors-applet --oaf-activate-iid=OAFIID:SensorsApplet_Factory --oaf-ior-fd=19
component: gnome-applet-sensors
crash_function: panel_applet_gconf_get_int
executable: /usr/libexec/sensors-applet
global_uuid: 738761f5d49cc37f60e716cb6ff1044435b50571
kernel: 2.6.33.4-95.fc13.x86_64
package: gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.5-2.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/sensors-applet was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)
Comment 1 behzadnouri 2010-05-29 13:46:20 UTC 
Created attachment 417861 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Igor Katalnikov 2010-06-16 06:44:30 UTC 
Package: gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.5-2.fc13
Architecture: x86_64
OS Release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)


How to reproduce
-----
1.Onbekend
2.
3.
Comment 3 Dario Castellarin 2010-06-21 12:58:07 UTC 
Package: gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.5-2.fc13
Architecture: x86_64
OS Release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)


How to reproduce
-----
1. Not sure

Comment
-----
I'm not really sure how it happened, I noticed the report in abrt a day later, reporting it anyway hoping it's useful.
Comment 4 Igor Katalnikov 2010-07-11 10:51:31 UTC 
Package: gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.5-2.fc13
Architecture: x86_64
OS Release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)


How to reproduce
-----
1. Unknown
2.
3.
Comment 5 Kevin L. Mitchell 2010-07-16 01:50:05 UTC 
Package: gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.5-2.fc13
Architecture: x86_64
OS Release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)


Comment
-----
No idea what happened here.  I didn't even notice that it had crashed until abrt advised me of a crash in another program.  Possibly this happened as I restarted or force-restarted my laptop?
Comment 6 Igor Katalnikov 2010-07-30 22:11:55 UTC 
Package: gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.5-2.fc13
Architecture: x86_64
OS Release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)


How to reproduce
-----
1. Unexplained
2.
3.
Comment 7 Igor Katalnikov 2010-08-03 21:01:37 UTC 
Package: gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.5-2.fc13
Architecture: x86_64
OS Release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)


How to reproduce
-----
1. Unexplained
2.
3.
Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2010-08-12 09:44:53 UTC 
gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.7-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.7-2.fc13
Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 21:26:14 UTC 
gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.7-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gnome-applet-sensors'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.7-3.fc13
Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2010-08-21 04:24:58 UTC 
gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.7-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.