Bug 597681
Summary: | Review Request: kupfer - A free software launcher | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ratnadeep Debnath <rtnpro> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | anibaldeboni, christoph.wickert, fedora-package-review, fschwarz, johannes.lips, notting, pahan, pingou, renich, susi.lehtola, ulrik.sverdrup |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | NotReady | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-04-13 17:01:45 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 593800 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Ratnadeep Debnath
2010-05-30 04:17:10 UTC
May be you need pygtk2-devel ? I suggest you should configure kupfer with --no-runtime-deps ; this configuration option is made specially for packaging. You can contact me for further guidiance if you wish. Building the man pages automatically conflicts with the --no-runtime-deps option. You can do it manually in the package (or I can fix it in a later version); anyhow I recommend fedora to build & install the man page for kupfer; you need rst2man for that (python-docutils). Debian can serve as inspiration, here is their rules file: http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/python-apps/packages/kupfer/trunk/debian/rulesa You will need to modify the package version and release tags as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Package_Version as upstream doesn't seem to abide to any sensible versioning standard. > %files -f INSTALLED_FILES > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc This is not good, but sloppy. Using a files-list with option -f ought to be the exceptional case, not the default. Do fill the %files section explicitly with entries for directories and files found in the buildroot. > Summary: kupfer is a simple, flexible, launcher for Gnome Repeating the package name in the %summary only occupies space and makes the summary less concise, because wherever the %summary would be displayed, the package name or file name would be nearby (notice e.g. how Anaconda displays the package summaries during installating). Better: Summary: Simple but flexible launcher for GNOME (Removing NEEDSPONSOR, I am sponsoring the submitter) Ratnadeep, would you update your srpm reflecting the comments in this review request? ping? I am having my semester examinations now. So, I would be busy for a while. Would someone like to become a co-maintainer of this package? If you're busy, I'll just mark this as not being ready for review. I'm up to it. Same problems... http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/kupfer.spec I'll revise these posts and correct accordingly... tomorrow... ;=s @Renich Bon Ciric You are most welcome to proceed with packaging kupfer. Thanks, buddy. I am right now entangled with so many works at a time. Ok, do these work?: SPEC: http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/kupfer.spec SRPM: http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/kupfer-203-1.fc14.src.rpm Shoot! Is there some progress on this review? I saw that 204 is released: http://kaizer.se/wiki/kupfer/ (In reply to comment #13) > Is there some progress on this review? I saw that 204 is released: > http://kaizer.se/wiki/kupfer/ Sorry, I'm a bit busy with synapse: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671862 But I will get back to this once I'm finished, ok? ;) Ok, I'm on it! I will try to package 205! ;) Ok, people! Here are the spec and srpm! Shoot! SPEC: http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/kupfer.spec SRPM: http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/kupfer-v205-1.fc14.src.rpm I'm a total newbie, so, please, be as meticulous as possible... if in the mood, that is! ;) Unfortunately we reporter of a bug, so even if you take over for Ratnadeep, he will remain the persoon who asked for this review. Can you please open a new review and then close this one as duplicate? (In reply to comment #17) > Unfortunately we reporter of a bug, so even if you take over for Ratnadeep, he > will remain the persoon who asked for this review. Can you please open a new > review and then close this one as duplicate? Sure *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 696249 *** |