Bug 597725

Summary: Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Raghunath <raghunath24>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, hicham.haouari, imranceh, notting, opensource, supercyper1
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-01-10 18:35:00 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description Raghunath 2010-05-30 06:01:22 EDT
Spec URL:http://github.com/downloads/raghunath/fedora/mozilla-svg-edit.spec
SRPM URL:http://github.com/downloads/raghunath/fedora/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.src.rpm
Description:SVG-edit is a fast,web-based,Javascript-driven SVG editor that
works in any modern browser.

rpmlint mozilla-svg-edit.spec ../RPMS/noarch/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.noarch.rpm ../SRPMS/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.src.rpm 
mozilla-svg-edit.noarch: W: no-documentation
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

koji Link : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2217850
Comment 1 Mohammed Imran 2010-05-30 09:33:07 EDT
*** Bug 597722 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Mohammed Imran 2010-05-30 09:36:08 EDT
*** Bug 597721 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Parag AN(पराग) 2010-05-30 23:05:19 EDT
*** Bug 597726 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Parag AN(पराग) 2010-05-30 23:05:23 EDT
*** Bug 597729 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Chen Lei 2010-05-31 02:24:05 EDT
I suggest you to send a mail to fedora-devel to discuss whether firefox entensions are worth to be included in fedora. 
Currently, very few firefox extensions are packaged and fedora don't have a guideline about this.
Comment 6 Till Maas 2010-09-08 18:14:24 EDT
(In reply to comment #5)
> I suggest you to send a mail to fedora-devel to discuss whether firefox
> entensions are worth to be included in fedora. 
> Currently, very few firefox extensions are packaged and fedora don't have a
> guideline about this.

It was not possible to package fedora extensions until recently afaik and they are valid packages. A guideline for the naming has recently passed:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-09-08/fedora-meeting.2010-09-08-16.01.log.html#l-67
Comment 7 Hicham HAOUARI 2010-11-28 08:49:13 EST
So you forces users to have the extension installed for both seamonkey and firefox. What the extension is broken for one application ? The user should remove it for both firefox and seamonkey.

As a suggestion, you can shorten the install section by creating an xpi then unpacking it to the desired location.
Comment 8 Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-06 10:38:14 EST
It doesn't look like the original submitter has participated in any of the discussion in this ticket.  Raghunath, did you still wish to submit this package?
Comment 9 Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-10 18:35:00 EST
No response; closing.