Bug 598031

Summary: [abrt] crash in obex-data-server-1:0.4.5-1.fc13: ods_obex_srv_get: Process /usr/bin/obex-data-server was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe>
Component: obex-data-serverAssignee: Bastien Nocera <bnocera>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 13CC: bnocera
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:c857e75d782e9a479f2033d744dca686bcbd8e86
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-08 18:15:45 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Sitsofe Wheeler 2010-05-31 09:44:44 UTC 
abrt 1.1.0 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/bin/obex-data-server --no-daemon ''
comment: Attempting to send a file to another computer via bluetooth resulted in a crash.
component: obex-data-server
crash_function: ods_obex_srv_get
executable: /usr/bin/obex-data-server
global_uuid: c857e75d782e9a479f2033d744dca686bcbd8e86
kernel: 2.6.33.4-95.fc13.x86_64
package: obex-data-server-1:0.4.5-1.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/obex-data-server was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
-----
1. Start desktop.
2. Click on bluetooth icon in the gnome-panel.
3. Go to Set up a new device....
4. (Pair with another computer)
5. Click on bluetooth icon in the gnome-panel.
6. Go to Send files to device...
7. Choose a file.
8. Click on the previously paird computer.
Comment 1 Sitsofe Wheeler 2010-05-31 09:44:46 UTC 
Created attachment 418229 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 18:15:45 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 630209 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 18:15:45 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #630209.

Sorry for the inconvenience.