Bug 59861
Summary: | DOS client app reporting read/write errors against samba share | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Scott Feldman <scott.feldman> | ||||
Component: | samba | Assignee: | Trond Eivind Glomsrxd <teg> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> | ||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 7.2 | CC: | abartlet, amit_bhutani, csherwood, dale_kaisner, john_hull, michael_e_brown, prasad.maribasavaiah | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | i386 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2002-06-05 17:02:41 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Scott Feldman
2002-02-13 23:16:04 UTC
Created attachment 45619 [details]
Detailed description
Continued testing with non-Linux server in same environment: Windows 2000: no client errors OpenUnix8 w/ Samba 2.2.3a: no client errors. Please test the 2.2.3a rpms available from http://people.redhat.com/teg/samba/ I see that 2.2.3a is mentioned in the "detailed description", but not mentioned otherwise - did it help? We tried 2.2.3a from samba.org on RH 7.2 and we get the same failure. Can we assume the tha RH 2.2.3a rpm is the same as what's available on samba.org? There shouldn't be code differences, no. Compiler flags and version, perhaps, but not more than that. Continued testing w/ Linux servers in same environment: RH 7.1 w/ Samba 2.0.7-36: passed, no client errors RH 7.1 w/ Samba 2.2.2 (from samba.org): failed w/ usual client errors Continued testing w/ different Samba versions: 2.0.8 PASS 2.0.9 PASS 2.2.0 FAIL 2.2.0a FAIL 2.2.1 FAIL This problem seems to have been introduced between 2.0.9 and 2.2.0. Can you recheck with current Samba 2.2 CVS (pserver.samba.org)? If this fails, can you raise this on samba-technical - it would be particuarly useful if you can post a link to the test application. Intel, Can you please attach copies of your testing scripts to this bugzilla, or post a link to where they can be downloaded from? I am experiencing the same issue using RH7.2 / Samba 2.2.1a upgraded to 2.2.3a on a Dell 1550. The RH box is being accessed by W2K IIS 5.0 web servers (I know). The only difference is that instead of a single large file, the IIS servers are constantly accessing many (upwards of 40,000 per dir) smaller files ranging from 10k to about 2Mb (all PDF's). Have there been any updates or fixes to this bug as of yet? We are seeing similar failure running X-copy test from Windows clients, the server is IA64 box with Redhat 7.2 (64-bit). The x-copy test is a simple batch file copies and comapre files from mounted drive (Linux box) using samba to local drives (Windows box). Thanks to some great help from the Samba folks, the original issue sighted appears to have been fixed with the latest Samba. We verified the clients do not experience errors using the tip-of-tree from samba.org (pull on SAMBA_2_2 and HEAD branches). Jeremy @ samba.org provided the fix with this explaination: "I fixed an issue where an ill-timed signal could cause a socket read to return with -1 and errno = EINTR". Would the other two submitters (csherwood, maribasavaih) please verify that this latest samba addresses their issues as well, and update this Bug so we can get closure on this issue. Thanks. We have been running on v2.2.5pre since it came out (about 4-6 weeks), and we have not seen this problem come back...looks to be fixed as far as I can tell. samba-2.2.5-6 is currently in Rawhide. |