Bug 598757

Summary: On bootup its failing
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: David <webmaster>
Component: kernelAssignee: Kernel Maintainer List <kernel-maint>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 13CC: anton, dougsland, gansalmon, gwirth79, harald, itamar, jfrieben, jonathan, kamp, kernel-maint, linuxdonald, madhu.chinakonda, than
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-10-09 23:18:40 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description David 2010-06-02 00:48:55 UTC
Description of problem:

On boot up its failing:

udevd-work[795]: mknod(/dev/capi/0, 020660, (191,0) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[900]: mknod(/dev/capi/1, 020660, (191,1) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[906]: mknod(/dev/capi/2, 020660, (191,2) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[907]: mknod(/dev/capi/3, 020660, (191,3) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[908]: mknod(/dev/capi/4, 020660, (191,4) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[909]: mknod(/dev/capi/5, 020660, (191,5) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[912]: mknod(/dev/capi/6, 020660, (191,6) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[913]: mknod(/dev/capi/7, 020660, (191,7) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[914]: mknod(/dev/capi/8, 020660, (191,8) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[795]: mknod(/dev/capi/9, 020660, (191,9) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[906]: mknod(/dev/capi/12, 020660, (191,12) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[907]: mknod(/dev/capi/13, 020660, (191,13) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[795]: mknod(/dev/capi/10, 020660, (191,10) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[908]: mknod(/dev/capi/14, 020660, (191,14) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[909]: mknod(/dev/capi/15, 020660, (191,15) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[912]: mknod(/dev/capi/16, 020660, (191,16) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[913]: mknod(/dev/capi/17, 020660, (191,17) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[914]: mknod(/dev/capi/18, 020660, (191,18) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[915]: mknod(/dev/capi/19, 020660, (191,19) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[916]: mknod(/dev/capi/20, 020660, (191,20) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[794]: mknod(/dev/capi20, 020660, (68,0) failed: File exists
udevd-work[917]: mknod(/dev/capi/21, 020660, (191,21) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[918]: mknod(/dev/capi/22, 020660, (191,22) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[919]: mknod(/dev/capi/23, 020660, (191,23) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[920]: mknod(/dev/capi/24, 020660, (191,24) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[921]: mknod(/dev/capi/25, 020660, (191,25) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[922]: mknod(/dev/capi/26, 020660, (191,26) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[1014]: mknod(/dev/capi/28, 020660, (191,28) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[1015]: mknod(/dev/capi/29, 020660, (191,29) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[1017]: mknod(/dev/capi/31, 020660, (191,31) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[1013]: mknod(/dev/capi/27, 020660, (191,27) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[1016]: mknod(/dev/capi/30, 020660, (191,30) failed: Not a directory
udevd-work[900]: mknod(/dev/capi/11, 020660, (191,11) failed: Not a directory
ERROR: cannot open /dev/capi20 nor /dev/isdn/capi20 - No such file or directory (2)
[60G[[0;31mFAILED[0;39m]

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Harald Hoyer 2010-06-25 12:05:38 UTC
Reassigning to the kernel.
Please rename /dev/capi to /dev/capi20 in the kernel module!

Comment 2 Than Ngo 2010-10-07 10:00:34 UTC
*** Bug 640924 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Than Ngo 2011-03-16 17:11:01 UTC
*** Bug 652345 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***