Bug 59929

Summary: ls -l misformatted for modified date.
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Need Real Name <hanpro7>
Component: fileutilsAssignee: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <bero>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Aaron Brown <abrown>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.2   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i586   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-02-15 02:31:52 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Need Real Name 2002-02-15 02:31:48 UTC 
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows 98; DigExt)

Description of problem:
When I use a particular option to the 'ls' command, I do not get the proper 
output as expected. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. ls -l 

	

Actual Results:  -rw-------    1 root     root        69632 Dec 26 17:33 core
-rwxrwxr-x    1 root     root        20072 Dec 10 20:44 proc
-rwxrwxr-x    1 root     root        19411 Dec 10 23:42 proc2
-rw-r-----    1 root     root         5158 Nov 30 16:38 users.txt
-rw-r-----    1 root     root         4929 Dec  1 12:13 usermap.back-1.2


Expected Results:  -rw-------    1 root     root        69632 Dec 26 17:33 core
-rwxrwxr-x    1 root     root        20072 Dec 10 2001 proc
-rwxrwxr-x    1 root     root        19411 Dec 10 2001 proc2
-rw-r-----    1 root     root         5158 Nov 30 2001 users.txt
-rw-r-----    1 root     root         4929 Dec  1 2001 usermap.back-1.2


Additional info:
Comment 1 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2002-02-15 09:07:55 UTC 
This is the expected and intentional behavior. 
 
ls -l shows the month, day and time on files younger than 6 months, month, day and year on 
older files.