Bug 59987
Summary: | TFTP to MicroSoft TFTP server does not work | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] eCos | Reporter: | Alex Schuilenburg <alexs> |
Component: | RedBoot | Assignee: | eCos bugs internal list <es-ecos-bugs-int> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | eCos bugs internal list <es-ecos-bugs-int> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | CVS | CC: | jlarmour |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2002-04-12 16:34:48 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Alex Schuilenburg
2002-02-18 11:06:33 UTC
Tested against the TFTPD32 server running on Windows with no problems. Is there a particular Windows server for which this fails? If so, which and how does one obtain it for testing? * From: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour at redhat dot com>
* To: Douglas Bush <dbush at extremeeng dot com>
* Cc: 'eCos Discussion List' <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
* Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 18:51:44 +0000
* Subject: Re: [ECOS] Problem TFTPing from redboot
* Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd.
* References: <
Douglas Bush wrote:
> > I did a couple of captures (hex ascii at bottom of files) with a running
> TFTP server, one from an OpenBSD TFTP client, and one from Redboot.
> Both were accessing Windows TFTPD32 for download.
> > What I noticed was that the Redboot requests OCTET transfers, and adds
> another 500 bytes or so of 0's to the end of the transfer.
> > Perhaps that's why windows TFTP servers don't work well with redboot...
It looks like there was a fix for this problem around 11th June last year
in CVS. Do your redboot sources predate that? If so, update! (Of course
maybe that's what you are trying to do ;-), in which case as Jesper says
something like ymodem over serial is a good intermediate workaround).
Jifl
Jifl, Did you get a private response from dbush to this issue? I assume we can close? -- Alex I didn't get any response. I'm closing it (it isn't a "real" customer). |