Bug 601770

Summary: SSSD in RHEL 6.0 should ship with zero open Coverity bugs
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh>
Component: sssdAssignee: Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Chandrasekar Kannan <ckannan>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 6.0CC: benl, dpal, grajaiya, jgalipea, syeghiay
Target Milestone: rcFlags: dpal: needinfo+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: sssd-1.5.0-2.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-01-14 13:36:14 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 579778    

Description Stephen Gallagher 2010-06-08 15:14:45 UTC 
Description of problem:
SSSD was run through Coverity Integrity Manager. It identified 26 minor bugs which should be resolved before release.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
sssd-1.2.0-13.el6
Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2010-06-08 15:33:28 UTC 
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux major release.  Product Management has requested further
review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux Major release.  This request is not yet committed for
inclusion.
Comment 5 Jenny Severance 2010-08-03 18:30:19 UTC 
Two new coverity issues discovered on verifying this with the newest build.
Comment 6 Stephen Gallagher 2010-08-03 18:39:52 UTC 
Moving to 6.1.0 at the direction of product management.
(02:36:59 PM) sghosh: sgallagh: move to bz to 6.1 unless you can justify it as a blocker

This issue is not a blocker. The new issues discovered by Coverity can only occur in an out-of-memory condition on the system.
Comment 14 Stephen Gallagher 2011-01-13 16:00:14 UTC 
This is an ongoing goal. I think we should probably mark this BZ as complete.
Comment 16 Stephen Gallagher 2011-01-14 12:27:17 UTC 
As mentioned above, this is an ongoing process. It will continue to be an upstream goal to maintain zero Coverity issues. Marking this bug complete.
Comment 18 Stephen Gallagher 2011-01-14 13:36:14 UTC 
Closing as NOTABUG (it's a development task)