Bug 602005

This works as you said when "Schedule > Reserve" is used instead of System > Take.

Is there any particular reason for not using Reserve?

I am not sure how the system list is generated when I click the show systems button, but I cant find the many system I want to reserve, the only way is to goto machine page and take, or use legacy rhts reserve workflow.

Hushan, can you give specific details so we verify it is/isn't working as expected ?

Thanks

Hi Raymond, the problem is the system list showed by show systems in scheduler/reserve is less than I search the systems/available, so that I met this problem, the machine I wnat to reserve is not in the list.

Hi Hushan,
There are other factors at play though,like what distro's a machine can support.

This is an example, at scheduler/reserve page, select the Reserve Criteria:
Arch: i386
Distro Family: RedHatEnterpriseLinux6
Method: nfs
Tag: STABLE
Select Distro: RHEL6.0-20100603.1_nfs server i386

then do show systems, there is no amd-dinar systems which is I want to reserve.

Hi Hushan,
I didn't check all the dinar machines, but at least on amd-dinar-01.lab.bos.redhat.com you need to be in one of the following groups

 Kernel Hardware  	   	
 Release Test Team 	
 Kernel QE 	
 Virt QE 		
 kernel-adm 	

I had a quick look and I couldn't see you were in any of them.

Hi Raymond, I am in Kernel QE, and I can take it in the machine page...

Ok, this looks like it could be a bug. 
The following query:
return query.filter(and_(
                                System.status==SystemStatus.by_name(u'Working'),
                                    or_(and_(System.owner==user,
                                             System.loaned==None),
                                      System.loaned==user,
                                      and_(System.shared==True,
                                           System.groups==None,
                                           System.loaned==None
                                          ),
                                      and_(System.shared==True,
                                           System.loaned==None,
                                           User.user_id==user.user_id
                                          )
                                       )
                                           )
                                      )

Says to me that a machine that has a group is never available,even to those who are part of a group that has the system.
Is this expected behaviour Bill ?

Hi, still not able to queue reservation on those machine which I am in the group, the only way to reserve these machine is to use legacy rhts reserve workflow, so would you consider this a blocker? any update on this?

I'm denying the beaker-blocker on this.  Since we didn't have that functionality previously.

I recognise there is an issue with the reservation code, I believe thats covered by this bz 612710

Folks, this BZ diverted from what's in Subject/Description. Clean it up please.

Thanks.

Closing,the original problem described in this bug is fixed in the current release