Bug 602602

Summary:	same job(pv guest install) fails in beaker but succeeds in rhts
Product:	[Retired] Beaker	Reporter:	Igor Zhang <yugzhang>
Component:	lab controller	Assignee:	Bill Peck <bpeck>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	0.5	CC:	bpeck, dcallagh, kbaker, mcsontos, rmancy
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-05-19 20:07:15 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Igor Zhang 2010-06-10 09:46:11 UTC

Description of problem:
Same job fails in beaker but succeeds in rhts, like pv guest install fails in my case.
In beaker,
https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/jobs/2371
https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/jobs/1730
In rhts,
http://rhts.redhat.com/cgi-bin/rhts/jobs.cgi?id=161713

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Version - 0.5.42

How reproducible:
I cannot guess a number, but I do see it happens a lot in the virt testing over z kernel.


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
pv install fails

Expected results:
pv install succeeds

Additional info:
I don't know it this relates to 
https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/logs/2010/30/1730/3167/27540/debug/task_beah_unexpected

Snip,
...
sh: ifconfig: command not found
...

Comment 1 Igor Zhang 2010-06-10 09:56:01 UTC

Another case:
http://rhts.redhat.com/cgi-bin/rhts/jobs.cgi?id=162337
vs.
https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/jobs/1772

Comment 2 Igor Zhang 2010-06-10 10:10:25 UTC

But this one succeeds in beaker!
https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/jobs/2480
And from its logs, I think this problem isn't related to "sh: ifconfig: command not found".

Below one fails too,
https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/jobs/1770

I never see such failures in rhts before.

Comment 3 Bill Peck 2011-02-09 16:11:53 UTC

Is this still an issue?  I believe we have sorted this out.

Comment 4 Igor Zhang 2011-02-10 07:21:47 UTC

I'll keep one eye on this when doing virt test for next 4.8.z kernel.