Bug 603178
Summary: | License tag incomplete | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger> |
Component: | ipython | Assignee: | Thomas Spura <tomspur> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | bkearney, shahms, tomspur |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | ipython-0.10-6.fc13 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-07-06 17:30:51 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Toshio Ernie Kuratomi
2010-06-11 18:36:57 UTC
Thanks! I changed this locally without commiting yet to CVS etc to: 11 # See bug #603178 for a quick overview for the choice of licenses 12 # most files are under BSD and just a few under Python 13 # There are some extensions released under GPLv2+ and (PSF or ZPL) 14 License: (BSD and MIT and Python) and GPLv2+ and (PSF or ZPL) After a grep thought the current git repo [1], I found this file: IPython/external/simplegeneric.py:7:#License: PSF or ZPL I don't know what PSF should be and ZPL does not exist as a fedora license. There is just ZPLv1.0 or ZPLv1.1 or ZPLv2.0. I quess, I need to ask upstream (ipython upstream and possible the main author of this extension). Am I right? [1] git://github.com/ipython/ipython.git Correct about needing to clarify the ZPL version. PSF == Python. An your mention of that file actually triggered another memory I had from reviewing the source :-( The IPython/external directory is full of bundled libraries. In this case, it might help us as python-simplegeneric is in Fedora so we can just use that and not need to worry about the licensing. Want a new bug on the externals after I track down what's in there? ipython-0.10-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ipython-0.10-3.fc13 ipython-0.10-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ipython'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ipython-0.10-3.fc13 ipython-0.10-4.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ipython-0.10-4.fc13 ipython-0.10-5.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ipython'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ipython-0.10-5.fc13 ipython-0.10-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ipython'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ipython-0.10-4.fc13 ipython-0.10-5.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. ipython-0.10-6.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ipython-0.10-6.fc13 ipython-0.10-6.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |