Bug 60346

Summary: RFE: separe idle from the base RPM
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Pedro Miguel Marques Morais <pmmm>
Component: python2Assignee: Trond Eivind Glomsrxd <teg>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.3Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-02-26 11:28:54 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Pedro Miguel Marques Morais 2002-02-26 11:28:50 UTC 
Description of Problem:
IDLE installation isn't optional as I think it should be.
The idle-related files should be split into a separate subpackage.
Comment 1 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2002-02-26 15:12:05 UTC 
I don't really see a need... too many subpackages (and idle doesn't add new
dependencies or that many bytes), and you can't see the forest for all trees.
Comment 2 Pedro Miguel Marques Morais 2002-02-26 15:30:25 UTC 
Same as 60345. Why does a desktop user need, on a package with LOTS of
dependencies, an interface used by programers?
If kdevelop was smaller, would it be included in kdelibs?
It's just the same to me.
1 kb in a base package is *much* more important than 1 kb in a seldom used
one.