Bug 60497

Summary:	Installs with language support for pt also include pt_BR
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	Pedro Miguel Marques Morais <pmmm>
Component:	anaconda	Assignee:	Matt Wilson <msw>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Brock Organ <borgan>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	7.3
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2002-12-15 15:19:51 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Pedro Miguel Marques Morais 2002-02-28 16:57:49 UTC

Description of Problem:
If you select language support for pt (Portuguese/Portugal) you also
get installed the support files for pt_BR (Portuguese/Brazil), even
though a separate option exist for those.

Comment 1 Michael Fulbright 2002-03-26 17:31:22 UTC

Deferring to future release.

Comment 2 Pedro Miguel Marques Morais 2002-12-01 22:21:24 UTC

maybe this could be fixed in the current cycle? 
there are a lot of languages with sub-locales...

Comment 3 Matt Wilson 2002-12-15 00:57:32 UTC

This is the correct behavior.  The files in /usr/share/locale/pt is a fallback
for pt_BR.

Comment 4 Pedro Miguel Marques Morais 2002-12-15 01:10:35 UTC

I agree with you; pt_BR should get pt files installed for fallback. 
What this bug is about is pt support getting pt_BR files installed, 
not the other way around. 
So: 
pt_PT support -> only pt and pt_PT files 
pt_BR support -> pt and pt_BR files 
Right now: 
pt_PT support -> pt, pt_PT and pt_BR files 
pt_BR support -> the same files

Comment 5 Matt Wilson 2002-12-15 15:19:51 UTC

this would be a bug in each individual package that contains pt_PT and pt_BR
files. there are packages that just use %lang(pt) for both pt_PT and pt_BR. 
anaconda is doing the right thing.