Bug 606307
Summary: | can't create LVM partition | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list> |
Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 13 | CC: | anaconda-maint-list, jonathan, vanmeeuwen+fedora |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-07-08 22:38:00 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Marcela Mašláňová
2010-06-21 11:54:03 UTC
Please attach /tmp/storage.log to this bug report. (In reply to comment #1) > Please attach /tmp/storage.log to this bug report. Where do I get this? The installation wasn't successful, so no storage was created. After lot of other attempts was installed system without LVM. I found a lot of files from anaconda in /var/log. Nothing else. Attempt the install, when you hit the "Not enough space" dialog, switch to tty2, and grab /tmp/storage.log. Now I have on netbook one ext3 partition, boot on ext3 and 3 ntfs partitions. If I run anaconda the same anaconda from the same usb key again, then the previous behaviour can't be reproduced. LVM is created. Could it be possible that it doesn't like ntfs on disc or existing ext2,3,4 is requirement for LVM partition? (In reply to comment #4) > Now I have on netbook one ext3 partition, boot on ext3 and 3 ntfs partitions. > If I run anaconda the same anaconda from the same usb key again, then the > previous behaviour can't be reproduced. LVM is created. Could it be possible > that it doesn't like ntfs on disc or existing ext2,3,4 is requirement for LVM > partition? It's very unlikely the failure had anything to do with ntfs and there is no interdependency between ext[234] and LVM physical volume partitions. If you encounter this failure again, please collect the log as described in comment 3 and reopen this bug report. Thanks. |