Bug 609819

Summary: March sar data was appended to February data
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: RHEL Program Management <pm-rhel>
Component: sysstatAssignee: Ivana Varekova <varekova>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: BaseOS QE - Apps <qe-baseos-apps>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: urgent    
Version: 5.4CC: donald.harper, fnadge, jbastian, jwest, ovasik, plyons, pm-eus, tao, varekova
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Patch, ZStream
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
sar data set the maximum number of days in log files too high, which appended data from the previous month to the next one instead of replacing it. This updated package resolves this issue and sets the maximum to 25 days.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-07-22 11:42:38 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 578929    
Bug Blocks:    

Description RHEL Program Management 2010-07-01 08:51:25 UTC
This bug has been copied from bug #578929 and has been proposed
to be backported to 5.5 z-stream (EUS).

Comment 6 Florian Nadge 2010-07-20 14:48:20 UTC
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.

New Contents:
sar data set the maximum number of days in log files too high, which appended data from the previous month to the next one instead of replacing it. This updated package resolves this issue and sets the maximum to 25 days.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2010-07-22 11:42:38 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0552.html