Bug 610843
Summary: | JMS issues on 2nd node of a cluster | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Other] RHQ Project | Reporter: | Heiko W. Rupp <hrupp> |
Component: | Alerts | Assignee: | RHQ Project Maintainer <rhq-maint> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Mike Foley <mfoley> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 3.0.0 | CC: | jshaughn |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-06-02 19:02:01 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Heiko W. Rupp
2010-07-02 15:04:34 UTC
Heiko, can we get some repro steps here? I think this happened when I had an error on alert sending (bad condition in the plugin like non-existing smtp server) in HA. 1 Server was running, the other was down and the JMS queue filled up. Then the error condition was cleared up and the 1. Server was delivering messages. When the 2nd server started, this issue showed up. But then JBossMQ is no known to be the most reliable JMS provider. It may be the case that we are not using the HA singleton service for JMS and that the JMS providers on the two HA servers are both looking into the same database table(s) and thus fighting for the queue entries there. Now HornetQ and lots of backend updates, likely not an issue |