Bug 6117

Summary: lpr does not print with local printer. Worked in 6.0
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: jstrand1
Component: lprAssignee: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.1CC: mark, mgalgoci, rvokal
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 1999-11-08 18:45:30 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description jstrand1 1999-10-20 04:32:42 UTC
I currently use an HP DeskJet712C printer, and although it
is only partitally supported, with the drivers from
httptech.com, I was able to get the printer to work in black
and white.  I would add an entry to printerdb in
rhl-printfilters, then add the printer (which was detected
on lp0) with printtool (with some extra options telling it
what driver to use).  This worked perfectly in 6.0, but now
when I restart lpd and try to print a test page, it gets
hung up and does not print.

Note, I can print via other means, so it is not the
printer.  However, the functionality provided with RedHat
6.0 is missed.

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 1999-10-20 04:42:59 UTC
Do you have the line:

alias parport_lowlevel parport_pc

in /etc/conf.modules?

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 1999-10-20 14:10:59 UTC
Did you recompile ghostscript with the different driver you're using
again?

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 1999-10-29 20:48:59 UTC
It's not running out of disk space, correct?

What happens if you install the rhs-printfilters from 6.0?

Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 1999-11-01 18:31:59 UTC
Try installing the rhs-printfilters from 6.0, and copying
/usr/lib/rhs/rhs-printfilters/master-filter to
/var/spool/lpd/<whatever>/filter.

Does that solve the problem?

What does the huge file in /tmp look like?

------- Additional Comments From   11/04/99 12:15 -------
In order to get the parallel port detected using the 2.2.12-20 kernel,
you must have the following conditions met:

1) Have "alias parport_lowlevel parport_pc" in /etc/conf.modules
2) Use a DMA parallel port mode. VERY IMPORTANT!

This is of course fixed in the 2.2.12-27 kernel. None of the above
apply for this kernel.

------- Additional Comments From   11/04/99 20:14 -------
add:  parport_lowlevel parport_pc  to /etc/conf.modules

Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 1999-11-08 18:45:59 UTC
OK, this should be fixed (the pbm2ppa problem) with
rhs-printfilters-1.58, which will be in the next Raw Hide
release.