Bug 61330
Summary: | Bogus whining from anaconda about space | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Michal Jaegermann <michal> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Beth Uptagrafft <bhu> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.3 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | alpha | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2002-05-01 04:34:47 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Michal Jaegermann
2002-03-18 00:51:38 UTC
I know what you're saying just I can't guarentee this is going to be true for all disk controllers Phil =--= Phil, disk controller has nothing to do with it. In a situation when half megabyte is a gross overestimate warnings about 5 Megabytes required are just counterproductive. One cylinder reserve is just a convenient way to partition things and as long as anaconda is unhappy with anything above, say, 250K just to leave a _very_ ample margin then I can only repeat that this is bogus and makes anaconda look clueless. So, do you know an example of a real disk controller and a disk with a cylinder below 100k? That would be pretty interesting with anything which realistically can be used. I am all ears... At this stage of the game, with all the QA thats already been performed, I'm going skip on this one,.. think of it as space for future expansion. Phil =--= |