Bug 613857
Summary: | Review Request: uvcdynctrl - Command line interface to libwebcam | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michael Cronenworth <mike> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 13 | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting, randyn3lrx, volker27 |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-07-15 01:17:52 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 576023 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Michael Cronenworth
2010-07-13 00:55:01 UTC
Ah, I clicked commit too quickly. Had older spec with wrong SVN release convention. Fixed. Spec: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/uvcdynctrl.spec SRPM: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/uvcdynctrl-0.2.0-0.1.20100322svn.fc13.src.rpm And... I was missing license files. :( Same spec link. SRPM: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/uvcdynctrl-0.2.0-0.2.20100322svn.fc13.src.rpm Just what I found looking over it: The release number should be something like 1.20100322svn%{?dist}, if I'm not wrong. You could also add the tar command. Is there a specific reason you use .xz? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Package_Release I don't know if it's useful to have a base package that requires it's own sub-package. There is no package libwebcam-devel, as you state in the BR. Libwebcam seems bundled in the tarball. Libraries should not be bundled. So will most likely have to create two separate packages. Besides that, there are two licenses in the libwebcam sub-directory. Please make sure, which one applies. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries You will also need ldconfig calls when shipping a library. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Shared_Libraries Ah, sorry, didn't see the review request for the library. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 576023 *** |