Bug 614037

Summary: [abrt] crash in nautilus-2.30.1-3.fc13: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: John Vogiakelis <John.Vogiakelis>
Component: nautilusAssignee: Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 13CC: tbzatek, tsmetana
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:decaf5906119657cc0bfdafd426fa876590dbbdf
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 15:32:02 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description John Vogiakelis 2010-07-13 14:39:43 UTC 
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: nautilus
comment: I just tried to delete some photos from my camera and nautilus crashed. The photos I wanted deleted were actually deleted, no problem with that but nautilus crashed just that one time where I deleted 3 or more photos. The next thing I did was to delete one more but nothing crashed and everything went according to plan.
component: nautilus
crash_function: nautilus_file_peek_display_name
executable: /usr/bin/nautilus
global_uuid: decaf5906119657cc0bfdafd426fa876590dbbdf
kernel: 2.6.33.6-147.fc13.i686
package: nautilus-2.30.1-3.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)
Comment 1 John Vogiakelis 2010-07-13 14:39:46 UTC 
Created attachment 431484 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 15:32:02 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 626207 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 15:32:02 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #626207.

Sorry for the inconvenience.