Bug 616695
Summary: | [qemu] [rhel6] dead lock in qemu: /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm: corrupted double-linked list: 0x00007fa3300637f0 *** | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Haim <hateya> |
Component: | qemu-kvm | Assignee: | Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 6.1 | CC: | abaron, danken, gcosta, hateya, kcao, mgoldboi, mkenneth, tburke, virt-maint, yeylon |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | RHELNAK |
Target Release: | 6.2 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-04-27 08:02:29 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 580953, 682015 |
Description
Haim
2010-07-21 08:30:28 UTC
why 6.1 bug? make it block rhel6kvmtier1, we could remove the blocker if the bug is indeed against rhel6.1. This issue has been proposed when we are only considering blocker issues in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. ** If you would still like this issue considered for the current release, ask your support representative to file as a blocker on your behalf. Otherwise ask that it be considered for the next Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. ** Please describe in more detail how you killed the vms. (In reply to comment #4) > Please describe in more detail how you killed the vms. you can do it either by kill qemu process with 'pkill qemu' or use vdsm and send stop command towards vm id (should behave the same). configuration (layers): -rhevm -vdsm -libvirt -qemu Is it kill as in SIGKILL or kill as in sending a SIGSTOP? I am puzzled by your comment that says it is the same as stopping the machine. If it is a SIGSTOP, then it raises in importance IMHO. |