Bug 616721
Summary: | RFE: Introduce API for XML normalization | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | xhu |
Component: | libvirt | Assignee: | Michal Privoznik <mprivozn> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 7.0 | CC: | ajia, berrange, cwei, dyuan, eblake, gkong, jdenemar, mshao, mzhan, tools-bugs, xen-maint, yoyzhang |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | 7.1 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | libvirt-0.9.9-1.el6 | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-08-07 12:13:12 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 813191 |
Description
xhu
2010-07-21 09:34:37 UTC
Patches sent upstream. Waiting for review: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-March/msg01188.html Moving to POST: commit ea7182c29f185e7c1527b10fbe16dc4ba1f45a88 Author: Michal Prívozník <mprivozn> AuthorDate: Mon Jun 6 12:20:11 2011 +0200 Commit: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn> CommitDate: Wed Nov 23 10:24:43 2011 +0100 virsh: Increase device-detach intelligence Up to now users have to give a full XML description on input when device-detaching. If they omitted something it lead to unclear error messages (like generated MAC wasn't found, etc.). With this patch users can specify only those information which specify one device sufficiently precise. Remaining information is completed from domain. v0.9.7-130-gea7182c Verify it with libvirt-0.9.9-1.el6 and it passed. We are reverting this patch because it causes a regression BZ 768268 Patches proposed upstream: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-September/msg00982.html *** Bug 840344 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** The discussion initiated by the patch from comment 17 had the following outcome: - there's no real use case for this API - part of the reasons may be covered by RNG validation (bug 888748) Let's close this RFE. |