Bug 61872

Summary:	If you're going to use an example procmailrc, there's a newer one...
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	Telsa Gwynne <hobbit>
Component:	procmail	Assignee:	Trond Eivind Glomsrxd <teg>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Brock Organ <borgan>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	7.3
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2002-03-25 13:16:38 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Telsa Gwynne 2002-03-25 13:16:34 UTC

procmail-3.22-4 appears to have a new example procmailrc in 
/usr/share/doc/procmail*/telsas_procmailrc.

Oh. My. Gods. I recognise that :) 

Seriously, I have a newer one which has up-to-date URLs (the ones at the
top are now 404, for example), and better patterns for mailman lists.

The one you have is http://www.linux.org.uk/~telsa/BitsAndPieces/procmailrc-1.0
and I have recently updated it: the current one is procmailrc (no -1.0). I
think it is very very well worth swapping to that one. It has more useful
addresses and better patterns.

It might also be worth substituting something something else for 'shit' in
the 'testing' section. When I wrote that, I didn't expect anyone to be shipping
it! 

I'm still stunned someone included that!

Comment 1 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2002-03-25 18:03:38 UTC

It got recommended, I looked and it was great :).

Updated your excellent doc file in 3.22-5 - thanks for writing it.